| Upcoming
Speaking Engagements

Gartner
Business Intelligence Summit
Chicago, March 6-8, 2006
Session: Data Shadow Systems,
Monday, March 6, 2:45 PM - 3:30 PM
Recent
Articles in DM Review
Align
Metadata and Business Initiatives, January
2006
The
Enterprise Data Warehouse Strikes Again,
Part II, December 2005
The
Enterprise Data Warehouse Strikes Again,
Part 1, November 2005
ODS
Redux, Part 2 (August 2005)
(Contact
us to have Rick Sherman speak at your
event or deliver onsite
data warehouse training to your employees.)
Sponsored
Links
Free white paper download:
Improve
Your Data Shadow System With Solutions from
Board M.I.T.
|
If
you're attending Gartner's
Business Intelligence Summit March 6-8 (in
Chicago) I'll be in the Solution Showcases Monday
and Tuesday, and delivering a session on Monday.
I hope you'll stop by and say hello.
I'd
like to extend a special welcome to those of you
who subscribed after last month's DCI conference.
We had a lot of fun in Chicago reconnecting with
the data warehousing crowd and meeting some new
faces.
Have
You Met Your Data Shadow Systems?
by
Rick
Sherman, Athena IT Solutions
Do you really know how your company’s
business groups are getting their hands on the
business information they need to operate the
company? Do you want to know?
Picture
this typical scenario: the finance group is cranking
out reports to examine business performance. They’re
looking at revenue and expenses versus budget
and forecast. They’re figuring out what
is selling, who is selling it and how much it
costs to produce it and deliver it to your customers.
And they are doing all of this in spreadsheets…dozens,
maybe hundreds of spreadsheets.
Look
closer and the plot thickens! Dozens and dozens
of Microsoft Access databases are being used to
extract data from your ERP and enterprise applications,
and even your data warehouse, and transform that
data for use in their spreadsheets. Despite all
the BI tools available, your company is using
personal databases and spreadsheets for data integration!
Does
this sound familiar? Not only is the finance group
doing it, but marketing, sales, and other organizations
are also using Microsoft Access and Microsoft
Excel to gather data from across your enterprise,
transform it, report on it and analyze it.
It’s
the same story at Fortune 100 companies and small-to-medium
size firms. All the business users are doing it.
Including yours. And there’s a name for
what they’re creating: data shadow
systems.
Business
users build data shadow systems to answer the
business questions that the enterprise applications,
data warehouse or reports fail to answer for them.
They’re filling a gap in the services they
receive from their IT departments. Users may not
want to get the information this way, but they
don’t see any alternative.
|
“Data shadow systems satisfy business
groups’ need for relevant business information
–exactly what they believed the elegantly
designed vendor-built application and IT business
intelligence systems would do for them.” |
Data
shadow systems satisfy business groups’
need for relevant business information –
exactly what they believed the elegantly designed
vendor-built application and IT business intelligence
systems would do for them. As data shadow systems
evolve over time, they encompass more and more
information, and increasing numbers of business
users come to depend on them.
So,
data shadow systems give business groups what
they want and everyone is happy, right? Not quite.
The fact is that business users do not want to
spend so much time creating these systems. Nor
should they. They should be spending their time
gaining a better understanding of their business,
not wrestling with technology.
Because
dealing with technology is not what business users
do best, they cobble data shadow systems together
without an overarching design. Each addition gets
more difficult to implement and more costly to
maintain. And when data management principles
and disciplines aren’t followed, data consistency
and integrity suffer. Yes, data shadow systems
often fulfill their business’s need, but
they do so in a very costly manner that uses too
many resources, and sacrifices data quality.
What
needs to be done? Leverage the inherent business
value of a data shadow system while rebuilding
it to take advantage of better design techniques
and more appropriate tools.
It’s
important to note that what does not need to happen
is a two-year IT project that implements the best-of-breed
technology, standards and practices while paying
for of the most expensive products in each software
category. This over reliance on costly, “silver-bullet”
technology is the reason why we keep hearing about
a 70% failure rate in data warehousing projects.
It is not that data warehousing is a failed approach,
but rather these mega IT projects generally don’t
meet expectations, nor do they provide a reasonable
return on their huge investment.
Rebuilding
data shadow systems is the right thing to do to
ensure consistent, quality information for running
a business. How one approaches this task, in a
way that maximizes value and ROI, is a story for
another day.
|